You have several children but you live in close proximity to only one of them and they have been helping you with groceries and banking as you get older. You appoint them executor of the estate and decide to designate them alone on the Registered Income Fund (RIF) or a Registered Retirement Income Fund (RRIF).
Your will says everything to be split evenly between your children.
Will your beneficiary designation hold up? The law in Ontario is uncertain and if your kids don’t have a great relationship or if one child needs funds, your planning may not withstand litigation and the kids may spend unnecessary funds on lawyers to sort it out.
First things first let’s discuss the Supreme Court of Canada’s position on joint bank accounts or investment accounts
In 2007 a Supreme Court of Canada case came out called Pecore v Pecore 2007 SCC 17 (“Pecore”) on the issue of an aging parent having a joint bank account or joint investment account with an adult child.
Clients tell me all the time that they are on mom or dad’s accounts. The Supreme Court wanted to clarify what happens to those accounts when the parent dies and an adult child is the surviving account holder. Are those joint accounts supposed to fall into the estate to be shared according to the terms of the will or is the other surviving account holder allowed to keep it all?
The majority of the Court decided that the onus is on the adult child who is joint on that bank account to rebut a presumption that mom or dad intended to have them as a joint holder for convenience alone (to help them manage their finances in their lifetime).
Rebutting the presumption means that adult child has to show evidence that they weren’t merely a joint account holder for convenience and that mom or dad intended to gift the balance to them. Examples of evidence that an adult child could point to include proof that the adult child put their own money in the account and was actively involved in the management/investing of that account. It could also include evidence of the deceased parent telling others their intention regarding that particular joint account on their death (telling neighbours, a financial planner, an account manager). The Court will also look to evidence of the state of mind of the parent at the time they opened the account (were they unduly influenced by that adult child, were they reliant on them for groceries and going to the bank? Any cognitive issues present?)
If the adult child rebuts the presumption, they get to keep what is in the joint bank account, if they don’t, it falls into the estate and is subject to the terms of the will, meaning likely splitting evenly with siblings if that’s what the will says.
So what does this have to do with TFSAs, RIFs, RRIFs, or RRSPs in Ontario estates?
Say you are the mom or dad, you have adult kids, and you want to designate a TFSA or RIF or RRIF to one child who you think will take care of most of the estate matters. We know the Supreme Court has this case law about joint bank accounts, but is the current law on beneficiary designated assets?
In Ontario we have conflicting law on this issue and we are going to have to wait to see if a higher court such as the Ontario Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court of Canada weighs in. For now, if there is sufficient money to fight over, it is possible your kids may pursue estate litigation for any TFSA, RIF, RRIF or RRSP proceeds that go to one child alone where all your kids are treated equally in the will.
Here are the two most current Ontario cases on this issue:
Calmusky v. Calmusky 2020 ONSC 1506
In this 2020 decision, Henry died leaving his sons Gary and Randy. In Henry’s last will, he left the residue of his estate to one of Randy’s children and his (Henry’s) nephew. He made Gary a designated beneficiary of his Registered Income Fund (RIF).
Should the rules about joint accounts in Pecore also apply to beneficiary designated assets? Justice Lococo took the position that yes, the analysis in the Pecore case should – in other words, Gary had to rebut the presumption that the RIF beneficiary designated to him should flow into the estate and be governed according to the terms of the will. The judge in this case found Gary could not rebut this presumption despite there being a valid beneficiary designation on file at the bank.
There was a lot of concern amongst estate lawyers and financial professionals after this came out because the whole idea behind a beneficiary designated asset is that it is subject to its own rules in law (specifically the Succession Law Reform Act and the Insurance Act) and that no further evidence should be required to prove intention because that would increase unnecessary litigation in this area and would open the door to questioning all beneficiary designated assets including life insurance in addition to the other kind mentioned above.
Mak (Estate) v. Mak 2021 ONSC 4415
Mrs. Mak died (her husband had predeceased) leaving their four sons, Raymond, Eddie, Steve and Kenny. The wills of their parents gifted everything equally to their four sons however on their mother’s death three sons discovered that their mother’s RRIF had been designated to Kenny alone.
In this 2021 decision, Justice McKelvey reviewed the issue of applying Pecore to beneficiary designated assets and ruled in the opposite way from Calmusky finding Pecore did not apply to the mother’s RRIF. The judge noted “The whole point of a beneficiary designation…is to specifically state what is to happen to an asset upon death.” In this case, Kenny got to keep the RRIF.
So until we hear from a higher court what should you do to avoid confusion and conflict?
Feel free to reach out to me, each case is situation specific but I do have a clause I can put in your will to document your intentions regarding jointly held property or beneficiary designated assets, also if you have a valid will in place, document your intentions on beneficiary designated assets yourself, indicate why you want that child to have that RIF or TFSA alone and sign it in wet ink and date it and keep it with your original documentation.
Also let your key advisors know (your lawyer, financial advisor, bank account manager, accountant etc.) that this is your plan and have them keep a note on file about this. You should be reviewing those beneficiary designations as frequently as you review your will and it’s always advisable to get some legal advice before making changes. Thanks for reading!